Press: News clips
Full-Spectrum Affordability
By Robert Riversong
(Valley
Reporter,
05/07)
The term "affordable housing" may suggest to some "low-income
housing" and to others "reasonably priced housing". It may suggest
government-subsidized apartments or on-the-market homes that
are within reach of a family earning the Area Median Income (AMI).
But rarely do we comprehend by that term the full spectrum of
issues which determine whether a house or coop or condominium
or rental unit is truly affordable not just to the current
occupant but to the community at large, to the broader society,
and even to the environment and the intricate web of life it
supports.
In the narrow terms of monetary cost, there are two primary
measures of affordability: initial cost (whether to build or
to buy), and operating cost (which includes utilities, maintenance
and repair). Initial costs are determined by the local market the
real estate market as well as the construction labor market and
the cost of building materials and it is affected by the choice
of materials and amenities built into the home. The dominant
factor of initial cost, however, is size.
The average Vermont home is 2800 square feet, well more than
the national average of 2459 square feet for new homes (2006).
As household size gets smaller, our homes have steadily increased
in size, height, number of bathrooms and other amenities.
The largest single determinant of operating cost is also the
size of a home. The single largest operating cost in Vermont
is, of course, energy for heating, cooling, hot water, lighting
and appliances. The Vermont Energy Code has helped to increase
the energy-efficiency of new homes, and the voluntary Energy
Star program takes this one step further. Yet, with energy costs
escalating as we enter the period of global peak oil, few new
homes are truly super-insulated and only 0.03% use solar technologies.
The payback for a super-insulated home begins the first month
of occupancy, as the incrementally-larger mortgage payment is
more than offset by the energy savings and banks will often allow
a higher debt-to-income ratio with an energy-efficient home.
How we make our homes durable and energy-efficient affects its
social and environmental affordability. All our building materials
have an "embodied energy", which includes the energy cost of
mining, milling, fabrication, finishing, transportation, and
storage all before any of it arrives at the building site.
There are also the "back-end" energy costs of final disposal
or recycling at the end of their functional use. These life-cycle
energy costs have been hidden from our checkbooks as "externalities" the
unaccounted costs of supplying our economy with raw and manufactured
materials and disposing of them when they wear out. Yet those "hidden" costs
are now deeply impacting our checkbooks as the world runs out
of fossil fuel energy (the US peaked in the 1970s and now imports
3/4 of its energy), our taxes are diverted to resource wars in
the Middle East and Central Asia, and we pay the social costs
of global warming (from the Katrina disaster to decrease in Vermont
maple syrup production).
While the lumber (approximately 16,000 board feet) in a new
home travels from Canada or the west coast or even from tropical
rain forests, locally-operated sawmills are shutting down for
lack of business. Fiberglass is still the most commonly installed
insulation, yet it has 8 times the embodied energy of cellulose
(recycled newspaper) which is a far better insulation. Many "green" homes
now use foam insulation, which has 25 to 30 times as much energy
investment as cellulose. Vinyl siding is the top choice for new
homes in the Northeast (83%).
When we choose to purchase artificial, imported or factory-built
housing elements, not only do we pay an energy premium but we
undermine the local skilled labor base the carpenters and foresters
and sawyers who help to keep our local community economies
vibrant. This is a social cost which affects the quality of life
and the overall affordability of our towns.
Long-term maintenance costs are not just determined by so-called "maintenance-free" artificial
materials, but mostly by the quality of construction and attention
to detail that a skilled local tradesperson can bring to a building
project. That attention to detail begins at the design phase
and requires considerable pre-planning, but doesn't necessarily
require the services of a high-priced architect. An experienced
designer-builder is often a much more affordable option for either
new construction or renovation.
Other costs of our housing choices which aren't typically considered
are zoning costs both in terms of the burdens that local zoning
imposes on the planning and building process and on the environmental
and social costs of traditional 10-acre zoning with private water
and septic systems. Cluster development with common water, sewer,
parking and open space set-asides and village center development
are more individually and socially-affordable options than the
conventional scattered-site land use pattern.
Mixed-use development, which might include single and multi-family
housing, starter homes and elderly housing, retail and commercial
buildings, and social services is a more organic and cost-effective
approach to creating healthy communities than the suburban car-dependent
isolation that has been the American "dream" and is fast becoming
a psychological, social and environmental nightmare. Community
land trusts, with land held in perpetuity by the community and
leased to individual users with limited-equity resale covenants
which keep housing permanently affordable, are a strategy for
preventing speculation from robbing the community of its vitally-important
housing stock.
So when we consider affordability in housing, we must broaden
our vision to encompass the full spectrum of individual, community,
social and environmental elements of authentically affordable
development. As the world grows smaller, our vision needs to
expand to encompass a more holistic approach to housing costs.
Robert Riversong is a designer/builder of affordable, passive
solar, super-insulated homes and teaches sustainable building
at Yestermorrow.
© 2002-2008 Vermont
Housing Awareness Campaign. All rights reserved.
Contact: info@housingawareness.org
|